Wednesday 21 October 2015

Spiritual Authority part 1

                                                                              
Spiritual Authority part 1 5.7.07

 Copyright © 2007 Ron Schwartz
All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Spiritual Authority

Part 1. Understanding Spiritual Authority

May 16, 2007

From Ron and Karen Schwartz

Introduction

There is a great deal of confusion over the subject of Spiritual Authority because people tend to confuse natural authority and spiritual authority. This confusion is pervasive in the teachings of well-known Christian teachers like Bill Gothard and Watchman Nee.

Natural authority is the power (or authority) people have over others. People tend to exploit the areas of their lives that contribute to their sense of power. For instance, it is not unusual for influential men to spend in excess of $1,000 on a name brand suit, $150 on a silk tie, $200 on leather shoes, thousands on a Rolex watch, and tens of thousands on classy cars. To them, generic and inexpensive do not convey a sense power.

Men are not alone in their pursuit of power. Women live in what they consider "a man’s world." Therefore, in order to feel significant, women feel they need to have some sort power over men. But since they are far less physically intimidating than most men, women have had to learn other ways to achieve power and control. One especially effective tool is there sex appeal. The most common way to do this is by accentuating their physically sensual characteristics. They tend to wear clothes that accent their physical shape, stockings and shoes that show off their legs, make-up and hairstyles that accent their faces, jewelry and nail polish to show off their hands, etc. Women have come to understand that a man’s sexual drive is his weakness, and so when they successfully exploit this weakness, they gain power over him. Other women go to the opposite extreme and attempt to act and dress like their male counterparts trying to fit in with them. None of this has anything to do with spiritual authority. It is merely people using natural authority to have power and control.

Natural authority has to do with intimidation, which then translates into power and control over others. You will find this true throughout all nature. Packs of animals have dominant leaders. They are usually the ones that are the most intimidating. Phrases like "the pecking order" or "the king of the jungle" come from the idea of natural authority. Likewise, men of stature, with deep voices and strong personalities, convey a sense of power. People who have large expensive homes and cars, and toys like yachts and planes naturally intimidate those who do not own such things. People with jobs in politics, upper management, the IRS, police departments, and pastoral ministries carry a sense of intimidation. Natural authority is all about the exertion of power and control over others.

Much of the Christian teaching on the subject of spiritual authority attempts to reconcile natural authority to the spiritual realm. But it just doesn’t work. It tends to create totalitarianism. It is responsible for the traditional thinking that spiritual authority is 1) a position held that is governing and controlling others and 2) measured by quantity (i.e., the number of people over whom they have power, the size of the corporation they manage, their income level, etc.). But this is nothing more than natural authority renamed. It is not true spiritual authority.

The mixing of natural authority into spiritual authority has made unclear the true nature of spiritual authority. It causes men to feel the need to be the pastor a church in order to be "significant," because having a church fulfills their need for authority. As a result, there is no end in sight to the startup of more and more small churches as men struggle to realize their twisted view of spiritual authority. And because quantity is the measure of such authority, there is no hope of unity, because pastors must then compete with each other for members in order to increase the size of their own church, which, in turn, increases his own authority. With natural authority, the winner is the one with the biggest piece of pie.

Could this really be what God intended spiritual authority to become? Of course not. This is actually the result of the lack of understanding of true spiritual authority. Spiritual authority is not about power or rule. It is about serving. It is measured not in the quantity it controls but in the extent of personal sacrifice. Spiritual authority is the opposite of natural authority in almost every respect.

Old Testament Influence

Throughout the Old Testament, there was no direct access to God. God did not speak directly to His people but through the law and prophets. Men were appointed as priests to represent the needs of God’s people. In addition, God did not work directly in the lives of His people, so they were incapable of transformation. They would never be anything more than what they were at birth. In the Old Testament, spiritual authority came through men who spoke for God as prophets or who represented the people to God as priests. It was a pyramid of authority that had God at the top followed by His governmental and religious leaders. The people of God were at the bottom.

In the New Testament, people no longer need to go through men to have direct access to God (And, behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom. Matthew 27:51). In the New Testament, God does speak directly to His people. Under this testament, God’s people no longer need men to represent their needs to God. They are able to "come boldly unto the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy, and find grace to help in time of need (Heb 4:16)." The roles that men once filled and the spiritual authority they once provided now belong to God who works in the heart of every believer.

God’s reasons for removing men as His people’s spiritual authority goes far beyond providing a way to allow His people direct access to Him. He wanted direct access to them. Having direct access to His people would have accomplished very little if His people were to remain in the same state of sin and rebellion (and thus condemnation) in which they were born. Through His New Testament, God is able to do something that never could have happened as long as men exercised spiritual authority: to change the hearts of men.

2 Corinthians 3:17-18 KJV

17 Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.

18 But we all, with open face beholding as in a glass the glory of the Lord, are changed into the same image from glory to glory, even as by the Spirit of the Lord.

Only when we submit our lives to the spiritual authority of the Holy Spirit can we realize the transformation God wants for us. Paul described the difference between the two testaments when he wrote:

Romans 8:2-4 KJV

2 For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death.

3 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:

4 That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.

Many Christians want to revert back to the spiritual authority of the Old Testament. They liked having men represent them to God as their priests. But men cannot change hearts. It is the work of the Holy Spirit. When men stand between us and God, the transformational power of God’s Spirit is either lost or limited. That model was a failure in the Old Testament, and it is a failure today. Consider the lack of spiritual maturity in contemporary Christianity. What profit has come from nearly two thousand years of men providing spiritual authority? God does not want His people submitting to the spiritual authority of anyone or anything other than Him. Men cannot change you, but God can.

Every Christian who has ever experienced transformation knows that it was a sovereign act of God. They experienced something that is indescribable and is, without question, from God’s Spirit. Knowing that, why allow men to tell you that this power from God must come through them? Jesus instructed His disciples:

Luke 24:49 KJV

And, behold, I send the promise of my Father upon you: but tarry ye in the city of Jerusalem, until ye be endued with power from on high.

The "power from on high" was the sovereign work of God. When it came, it was not ushered in through a prophet or a sermon. The transformational power was their spiritual authority given directly to them from God, not through priests or prophets, and it changed the world. If the world is to be changed again, we must once again submit to God’s Spirit alone as our spiritual authority.

Spiritual Authority or Sovereignty

Spiritual authority is the authority of the Holy Spirit that He brings into our lives. It is spiritual authority.

John 18:36 KJV

Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.

Jesus explains that His kingdom – that over which He reigns – is not part of the kingdoms of this world. He told His disciples, "Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you (Luke 17:21)." Christ’s kingdom, to which He brought His authority, is in our hearts. We Christians have the unique power to lay down our lives. We have power to overcome temptation and to deny ourselves of sin. We have the power to love one another as He has loved us. This is the greatest power that anyone can possess. It is NOT the power to rule over others (as if His "kingdom were of this world") but to rule one’s self. True spiritual authority is the authority over self. The best description of spiritual authority comes from none other than the Lord:

Matthew 5:38-44 KJV

38 Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth:

39 But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.

40 And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloke also.

41 And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him twain.

42 Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away.

43 Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy.

44 But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you.

This is the greatest power! No conqueror who ever lived, no warrior who ever fought, and no king who ever reigned has had the power to rule the heart. Natural authority may have power to control others, but only the spiritual authority of God’s Spirit can control our hearts. Spiritual authority grows, not in having a church, but in laying down your life for others. In this context, an elderly widow who seeks only to serve others may have more spiritual authority than any other person in her church.

True spiritual authority is foundational. Consider the following scripture:

1 Corinthians 3:10 KJV

According to the grace of God which is given unto me, as a wise masterbuilder, I have laid the foundation, and another buildeth thereon. But let every man take heed how he buildeth thereupon.

Ephesians 2:19-20 KJV

19 Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God;

20 And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone;

Revelation 21:14 KJV

And the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and in them the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.

Here we find ministry as supporting, or foundational to, believers. Most ministers have confused spiritual authority with natural authority and have come to see their ministries at the top of their churches. When ministry is at the top of the church, it becomes sovereign. True ministry is foundational rather than sovereign.

Most church leaders describe church leadership as an upside down triangle with the people on top and the leaders at the bottom. It is remarkable how they can say the right things but then not practice it. They are no more at the bottom than the President of the U.S. is at the bottom of our government.

To understand the quagmire that results from the contemporary spin on spiritual authority (i.e., the rule that men have over others in their church), look no further than tragedies like Jim Jones and David Koresh. These may be extreme examples of spiritual abuse, but left on their own, every group that allows a person (man or woman) to be the spiritual authority will eventually face the temptation of becoming a cult. People fail to understand that most cults started out as legitimate churches. David Koresh and the Branch Dividians were at one time Seventh Day Adventists, Jim Jones was a holiness preacher, David/Moses Berg was part of the Missionary Alliance Church, and Jim Bakker went to Central Bible College in Minnesota, beginning his career as an itinerant pastor. Each of these men allowed the popular ideology of spiritual authority to get out of control.

Most of us know of churches that we consider cults or that at least act "cultish." In each case, spiritual leaders with varying degrees of power exercise control over these groups. Submission is always an important part of each member’s spiritual development. Anyone who questions the power of the leader is viewed as spiritually underdeveloped (immature) and rebellious. Quite often, they are compared to Judas. We all know that this form of power is wrong. We know intuitively that it is not spiritual authority but a natural authority to which misled people submit.

There is no difference between these extreme examples of cult control and the power we attribute to spiritual authority. None! No one involved in a cult believes that their group is a cult. No one submitting to what they consider spiritual authority believes it to be anything but spiritual. They submit to what they believe to be their spiritual authority because they are persuaded that it pleases God. Nothing could be further from the truth. It does not please God that you submit yourself to men when it is God alone to whom you should be submitting. It is for this reason that God does NOT maintain a spiritual hierarchy among His people.

True spiritual authority is the power to be the servant of all, and being a servant is without question foundational. Only people who have laid down their lives and who have the active power of the Holy Spirit in their lives can be true servants. True spiritual authority is one of the most difficult things to master because it requires self-sacrifice and self-denial. Spiritual authority is the power to take up one’s cross and follow Christ. Men who submit themselves to the true spiritual authority of the Holy Spirit will not become the spiritual authority to others. They know that to do this would be to supplant God.

Accountability

There is a popular notion among many Christian groups that Christians must be "accountable" to someone. That someone provides the spiritual authority in their lives. They point to the structure of the institutional church as providing accountability. We must challenge that notion.

Accountability in institutional churches is a myth. It does not exist. Just how involved are church leaders in the lives of the average church member? How much of their day-to-day activities are they even aware? Most church leaders have a general knowledge of their members but nothing more. In fact, barring a phone call from a spouse or reading about an arrest in the newspaper, most church leaders would never know about a person’s alcohol or drug problems.

"Accountability" is not about being aware of someone’s problems. True accountability is invasive. It carries with it the sense of legal responsibility. Look up the word yourself.

Then there are the groups like Promise Keepers that encourage men to come together and to share their inner weaknesses with one another. They call this "accountability." What men choose to share is voluntary, and so is how they choose to color it. True accountability is not voluntary. It is "liable." Choice is removed. These "feel good" groups are not invasive into each other’s lives any more than church leaders are in the lives of their members. So we say it again: accountability is a myth. Christians act independently and freely with only the fear of getting caught, their actions and motives discovered.

True spiritual authority is transformational. You cannot resist God once you submit your life to Him. However, when the "form" of "accountability" replaces true spiritual authority, the response is no longer to God but to men. Instead of responding to God and experiencing His transformational power, people tend to hide who they really are and learn to deceive in order to hide their sin. When Adam yielded to Satan for his spiritual authority, he found himself hiding from God and covering himself with the leaves of self-righteousness.

"Accountability," as defined today, is just another form of contemporary spiritual authority that usurps God’s rightful place. It breeds hypocrisy and religious form. The stronger the influence of men, the more hypocrisy and religious form will exist. Most people really are not afraid of God finding out what they are like and what they do. They are afraid that their pastor will. This should demonstrate to them the extent to which men have come to replace true spiritual authority in their lives.

In summary, spiritual authority in the New Testament is the rule of the Holy Spirit in our lives. It is this rule that has the power to transform us into a "new creature (2 Corinthians 5:15)." But men have patterned the institutional church after the spiritual authority found in the Old Testament where God did not act directly in the lives of His people. As a result, contemporary Christianity does not experience even a fragment of the transformational power of God.

Amen.

E-mail us: kmsrjs@triton.net. 

 
Articles by Ron Schwartz       OTHER ARTICLES

 RETURN HOME

t Was About Jesus

                                                                              
It Was About Jesus

I believe Christianity today is extremely different than it was in the beginning. At least what we define as Christianity has changed. 

For the early church it was all about Jesus. It wasn't about a pastor, it was about Jesus. It wasn't about religion, it was about Jesus. It wasn't about going to church, it was about Jesus It wasn't about "getting involved," it was about Jesus. It wasn't about reading the Bible, it was about Jesus. It wasn't about reaching the lost, it was about Jesus. It wasn't about planting churches, it was about Jesus. It wasn't about ministry, it was about Jesus. It wasn't about "believing the right stuff," it was about Jesus. It wasn't about being in leadership, it was about Jesus. It wasn't about morality, it was about Jesus. It wasn't about politics, it was about Jesus. It wasn't about the gifts, it was about Jesus. It wasn't about dunking or sprinkling, it was about Jesus. It wasn't about communion, it was about Jesus. It wasn't about "who's in charge," it was about Jesus. It wasn't about how to meet, it was about Jesus. It wasn't about church growth, it was about Jesus. It wasn't about the next generation, it was about Jesus. It wasn't about miracles, it was about Jesus. It wasn't about spirituality, it was about Jesus. It wasn't about Jabez, it was about Jesus. It wasn't about being "Purpose Driven" it was about Jesus. It wasn't about being "seeker sensitive," it was about Jesus. It wasn't about tradition, it was about Jesus. It wasn't about charismatic or non-charismatic, it was about Jesus. It wasn't about denomination, or non-denomination, it was about Jesus. It wasn't about a house or a building, it was about Jesus. It wasn't about a sermon, it was about Jesus. It wasn't about a time of worship, it was about Jesus. It wasn't about music, it was about Jesus. It wasn’t about getting “your batteries recharged,” it was about Jesus. 

There was only one thing the early church was defined by, and that was Jesus. So much so that the people who looked at these strange followers of Christ said, "Man! These followers of Christ are like 'little Christs'!" Or "Christians." I'm afraid that the title doesn't quite fit the same today as it did back then. They earned the title. We merely inherited it.

Articles by Loren Rosser


Four myths regarding Christian leadership.


Four myths regarding Christian leadership. 

by Ron Schwartz:

A single page from the journal of John Wesley reads: 

"Sunday a.m., May 5 -Preached in St. Ann's; was asked not to come back any more. 

Sunday p.m., May 5- Preached at St. John's; deacons said, 'Get out and stay out.' 

Sunday a.m., May 12 - Preached at St. Jude's; can't go back there either. 

Sunday p.m., May 12-Preached at St. George's; kicked out again. 

Sunday a.m., May 19- Preached at St. Somebody Else's; deacons called a special meeting and said I couldn't return. 

Sunday p.m., May 19 - Preached on the street; kicked off the street. 

Sunday a.m., May 26- Preached out in a meadow; chased out of meadow when a bull was turned loose during the service. 

Sunday a.m., June 2- Preached out at the edge of town; kicked off the highway. 

Sunday p.m., June 2- Afternoon service, preached in pasture; 10,000 people came." 

Have you every wondered if perhaps a John Wesley has ever visited your church? How was he treated? Was he dismissed? Perhaps a growing or mature Christian who challenges your views may someday become a prominent Christian leader. Would you find in his journal such an entry concerning your church? What about an angel? Could it be that a person who questioned the wisdom of your decision was, in fact, an angel you “entertained unaware?” How was he treated? How was he received? Do you absolutely know that you treated all God’s children with the dignity and respect due one of His children?

        
                                                               Coming Down From The Mountain 10.2.06


by Ron Schwartz:

 
Four myths regarding Christian leadership. 



Myth #1. “There is nothing wrong with being respected and honored. Everyone enjoys it.”

It was not the nature of Jesus to be set on a pedestal. He wanted to mix in with the people of God. His desire was for people to see Him as they did themselves. He desired to know them on a personal level and to be a support and encouragement to them. Their trust in Him was natural because He was one of them. Jesus demonstrated for us what He meant by being “the servant of all.” Servants don’t see themselves as anything: they have no title, they do not rule anyone, and no one esteems them. The best they can ever hope to be is adequate - to simply do what is required of them.

Luke 17:7-10 KJV

7 But which of you, having a servant plowing or feeding cattle, will say unto him by and by, when he is come from the field, Go and sit down to meat?
8 And will not rather say unto him, Make ready wherewith I may sup, and gird thyself, and serve me, till I have eaten and drunken; and afterward thou shalt eat and drink?
9 Doth he thank that servant because he did the things that were commanded him? I trow not.
10 So likewise ye, when ye shall have done all those things which are commanded you, say, We are unprofitable servants: we have done that which was our duty to do.


When you consider this, you must agree that most Christian leaders do not have a servant’s mindset. To begin with, they believe that they are profitable. In fact, many believe that they are the only ones who are. Many see themselves as the most important element of the Church. They see themselves as essential. They enjoy standing or sitting up front on their raised platforms. They enjoy commanding silence as everyone listens. They enjoy their private entrance, having the final word, having people come to them for approval. In short, they enjoy being esteemed. The last thing they believe is that they are unprofitable.

Where is the humility among the contemporary Christian elite? Modern Christian leaders are focused on building their empires. They advertise it instead of Christ (i.e. John Doe Ministries, or Jane Doe Prophetic Center). Ask yourself, what would change in the life of the average Christian it one or more of these ministry empires simply vanished. Christians would still serve God, they’d still raise godly children, and they’d continue to be a light to this world. Nothing would change. These Christian ministries exist simply to serve themselves. And in the end they are only profitable to themselves. 

I enjoy spending time with Christians who know nothing about me. During these brief moments, I find myself close to a heart that has God living in it. I don’t have to go up onto a mountain to be near God; I can find Him in His people. What they say echoes the voice of the Holy Spirit. Each child of God has a unique relationship with Him and therefore a unique perspective. Imagine the privilege we enjoy in being able to spend time with one of God’s children. That’s what many Christian leaders lose in being esteemed. They lose the ability to enjoy God’s children the way He does. Perhaps if they spent less time up on the mountain…

Myth #2. “As Church leaders, all we are to do is what we feel God has called us to do.”

There was a time in church history when there was no TV, radio, magazines, books, Christian forums, or email, and even traveling across town was done on foot. It’s easy to understand that in a culture such as this, access to information is valued. During the first century church, prophets and teachers would travel from city to city bringing the message God gave them to local assemblies who were eager to hear more of the evolving revelation of God. People wanted it. But things have changed within Christendom.

Today, in order for a teacher or prophet to get an audience, they have to create one. Pastors “protect” their flock by preventing others from coming in or by requiring them to join their organization (in some manner). Teachers and prophets are no longer welcome in a local assembly (unless they belong to that specific denomination). So more and more ministers are discovering that in order to get an audience, they need a church. Take Meridian, Mississippi, for example. Some documents place this city of 40,000 to have one church for every 146 adults. This does not even consider all the house churches, Bible studies, and other religious groups. Sullivan County, Tennessee, brags of having one church for every 40 people, and some sources have Hoboken, New Jersey (pop. 38,5000), to have one church for every city block. Many cities are now invoking local ordinances to limit the number of churches.

The closed nature of pulpits and a need for people to share the message God gave them has given rise to the popularity of house churches. Many mature Christians often become rejected by their pastors and labeled as troublemakers. More often than not, it is because they grew enough spiritually to become a peer to the pastor. The pastor often feels threatened by the views of an influential member who does not see completely eye-to-eye or questions his control or decisions. This individual is eventually seen as competition and pressured into leaving. I have met hundreds of individuals who describe this same story: a pastor uses manipulation, politics, and gossip to drive out a mature Christian who dares to question him. The pastors believe that such Christians must be subjugated regardless of their spiritual maturity. Many house churches have begun because pastors just don’t know what to do with mature Christians who question them or disagree with them. 

People should not have to create a new church group in order for them to express their gift(s) in the Lord. If a house church begins, it should be because this is the direction and leading of the Lord, not because someone needs an avenue to express his message. The biggest reason for stagnation in churches is due to the limitations that pastors put upon their congregations. People are no different from their pastors. They want to do what they sense God has called them to do as well. Why must they leave their churches to do it?

By discouraging the freedom of other types of ministries to operate within the local body of Christ, pastors have forced all ministers to become pastors. I do not believe that this is what God intended. Teachers and prophets are no longer welcome to travel abroad bringing their revelation to the rest of God’s people. Today, they must create circuits of churches that will receive them. These become a sort of mini-denomination. But most prophets and teachers succumb to the barriers and turn into a pastor of a local assembly.

Myth #3. “As leaders, we are to administer, manage, and direct the service as we sense and discern the direction of the Spirit. We are to discern the spirits.”

Almost all pastors believe this and will even say it out loud. Their congregations also know they believe this way. But have they ever considered how their congregations interpret it? Most Christians are self-conscious about their spiritual knowledge and gifts. Most become so overly concerned that they will do something wrong and get corrected by the pastor that they never do anything. So what do we see as a result of this? All of Christendom expecting pastors to do everything. People don’t evangelize, operate in their gifts, or do anything else because they might do it wrong and then the pastor will step in and they will find themselves in trouble. Most Christians know of friends who for one reason or another have gotten into trouble and are now no longer a part of the church. To avoid the trouble that often comes from stretching their wings, people often do nothing. So everything falls on the pastor to do. As a result, pastors walk around complaining that everything falls on them, but the truth is they really enjoy it! If they do everything themselves, then they know things will be done “right,” and everyone will know how important and how truly indispensable they really are.

A church should be a school where people feel free to make mistakes, a place where they feel free to exercise their spiritual gifts because they know they are supposed to, a place where they know that they will not be rebuked or scolded for getting it wrong, a place where they can mature and, in time, help others. This is how the original Christians operated. When one church (the church of Corinth) fell into chaos, Paul set in place a temporary structure to help them operate correctly. He did not prohibit the use of gifts. He helped them get it right. However, if one of today’s pastors entered a church like that, he would “put his foot down” and effectively end most (if not all) manifestations of spiritual gifts. In no time flat, Corinth would be transformed into today’s powerless pastor-controlled church.

Where in the scripture does it say that all other gifts and ministries must be in submission/subjection to the gift of the pastor?

Consider the following scripture: 

I Corinthians 12:27-28 KJV

Now ye are the body of Christ, and members in particular. And God hath set some in the church, first apostles, secondarily prophets, thirdly teachers, after that miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, governments, diversities of tongues.

Where are pastors in this list? They are at the bottom of it (governments), just above diversity of tongues. Why, then, do pastors feel that all other gifts in the church must be subject to them? Why do they believe that they are the ultimate authority? The truth is that pastors were meant to operate WITH other ministries, not OVER them.

Someone sent this to me. A single page from the journal of John Wesley reads: 

"Sunday a.m., May 5 -Preached in St. Ann's; was asked not to come back any more. 

Sunday p.m., May 5- Preached at St. John's; deacons said, 'Get out and stay out.' 

Sunday a.m., May 12 - Preached at St. Jude's; can't go back there either. 

Sunday p.m., May 12-Preached at St. George's; kicked out again. 

Sunday a.m., May 19- Preached at St. Somebody Else's; deacons called a special meeting and said I couldn't return. 

Sunday p.m., May 19 - Preached on the street; kicked off the street. 

Sunday a.m., May 26- Preached out in a meadow; chased out of meadow when a bull was turned loose during the service. 

Sunday a.m., June 2- Preached out at the edge of town; kicked off the highway. 

Sunday p.m., June 2- Afternoon service, preached in pasture; 10,000 people came." 

Have you every wondered if perhaps a John Wesley has ever visited your church? How was he treated? Was he dismissed? Perhaps a growing or mature Christian who challenges your views may someday become a prominent Christian leader. Would you find in his journal such an entry concerning your church? What about an angel? Could it be that a person who questioned the wisdom of your decision was, in fact, an angel you “entertained unaware?” How was he treated? How was he received? Do you absolutely know that you treated all God’s children with the dignity and respect due one of His children?

I know many pastors, and they are all different. Each of them would probably handle each situation differently. So who is correct? To whom should people listen? With the pastoral mentality of being the final authority for their churches, people just better hope they find that pastor who is absolutely right all the time. Statements like, “we are to administer, manage, and direct the service as we sense and discern the direction of the Spirit” are COMPLETELY subjective. Depending on your own spiritual gift(s), you may sense something different from what others sense in a meeting. If you are not a prophet, you might not realize that God wants to speak prophetically. But those gifted in that area will know. If pastors are to manage and direct the meetings, how are those who are gifted in other ministries able to operate? Unless pastors believe that they possess all ministries and all the spiritual gifts, how could they possibly know which way to direct a meeting? Such statements clearly say, “God cannot do anything without running it past me first.” It places all gifts and ministries in subjection to the ministry of the pastor.

Having been a pastor before, I understand why pastors see themselves as a sort of parent over people, especially young Christians. But why would pastors feel the need to take on a parental role to people who have been ten or twenty years in the Lord? Is there no point at which people grow out from under their supervision? Will they never be allowed to grow up? And if they do grow up, will they need to leave the church?

Also, if “a” pastor represents the final authority in a local church government (and given the closed nature of most church operations) who, then, could ever correct them? Would they always be right? Pastors who operate this way had better never get it wrong. Remember the warning of Jesus concerning the little ones:

Matthew 18:4-6 KJV

Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven. 5 And whoso shall receive one such little child in my name receiveth me. 6 But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.

Myth #4. “As pastors, our job is to be like Moses. We hear from God and deliver His word to the people.”

This myth implies that God cannot or will not speak directly to His people. It contradicts such scriptures as:

John 14:26 KJV
But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.

1 John 2:20 KJV

But ye have an unction from the Holy One, and ye know all things.

Jeremiah 31:33-34 KJV

33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.
34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD; for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.

Such a statement implies that people held in prison in foreign countries are less knowledgeable about God since they do not have access to pastors or other Christian leaders. It means that they cannot be as spiritually developed as those with pastors. I’m not suggesting that pastors do not have a word; I AM suggesting that the word they have is no greater or more important than the word He speaks to any of His other children.

This myth also implies that God’s New Testament model is to have classes of Christians. It implies that not everybody is invited to go up the mountain, and that God wants a close relationship with only a few, or an inner circle, if you will. God has never wanted this. It was this way in the Old Testament only because “…the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned (1 Corinthians 2:14).” However, in the New Testament “…God hath revealed them unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God (1 Corinthians 2:10).” 

God once chose men to speak through since His people did not have his indwelling Spirit. But that is no longer the case. God no longer has to come down in a cloud or appear through an angel to give us instruction. He no longer needs a Moses to voice His will. This is because “…when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come (John 16:13).”

Conclusion

It is generally accepted that Joshua followed Moses (at least part way) up Mount Sinai when the law was given. The scripture is quite vague here. Also, the scripture is not clear whether Moses asked him to go along or God wanted him there. What we do know is that both leaders whom God would use to bring His people to the Promised Land to conquer it were missing when the people built the golden calf. What would have happened if Joshua had stayed “among” the people? Would his voice of authority have been enough to prevent God’s people from committing idolatry? Did him going up the mountain affect anything?

I typically try to stay away from presenting a model. However the nature of this document makes it unavoidable. For if these statements are myths, what, then, is right?

Try to imagine an “evolving plurality” of elders (i.e., pastors or bishops), a group of natives (as opposed to missionaries or “transplanted leaders”) of the area (i.e., they lived there long enough to call that place their home) who make up a leadership team. Their function is NOT to direct and manage the meeting but to mentor other young Christians to be able to take over the mentoring function themselves. Their meetings belong to God. Therefore, decisions are not made by a few elite but by the entire body. In this model, leadership is not closed. “Closed” means that only a select few can be leaders and they continue to lead until they vacate their office. Instead, everyone is able to grow into leadership. There is no limit. They are responsible for the financial and everyday affairs of the church, but they exercise no control over the people. They provide wisdom, insight, and suggestions, but their role does not cross over into control or rule. They are role models. The team exists to make each leader aware that their opinion and view is not sacred and that they must work with the rest the body. In short, it is to prevent any dominant individual from exercising dominion over others. In this type of plurality, some leaders may not feel directed to teach. Some may feel directed toward outside ministries, like prison ministries, food pantries, etc.

Being a part of the plurality obligates each of the other leaders to aid each other in every way necessary to help them be successful in the endeavors to which God has called them. It guarantees that dominant people do not take advantage and bully others with their views. It exists for the protection of the congregation as opposed to the control of it. 

In short, plurality is NOT: 

· a decision-making body (a committee), or 

· a group that controls and directs the meetings. 

Instead, plurality should:

· be open (allowing others to grow into eldership), 

· protect people from domineering personalities,

· offer mentorship as opposed to lordship, and

· insure that the vision each member of the body has from the Lord is realized.


With committees, everyone is looking out for self. It is easy to identify a committee because you will find people seeking to control others, whereas pluralities are all about empowerment of others. Committees use politics (manipulation) to gain advantage; pluralities operate through the unity of the Spirit to produce balance. In a true plurality, no one has control but God.

So what about structure? Is having structure wrong? Is it wrong to have a meeting structured, organized, and orchestrated? Not if that’s what you want. Structured meetings guarantee that other spiritual gifts (other than those who orchestrate the meeting) will not have a part in the meeting. I generally encourage structured meetings for Bible studies or meetings with special purpose, guest speakers or presentations. In these meetings, study notes can be prepared in advance and the teaching can be highly focused. There’s nothing wrong with this. However, if you are looking for a type of meeting that allows ALL (including youths) to grow and develop spiritually, then structure is not the solution. Meetings can also be mixed with both spontaneity and structure.

For maximum spiritual growth, all people must feel free to use their gifts regardless of whether or not they are elders. The elder’s authority does not include judging (discerning) the spiritual gifts of others. This should be left to either the body (congregation) or by consensus of those who have like gifts. Consider the following scripture:

1 Corinthians 14:29-30 KJV

29 Let the prophets speak two or three, and let the other judge. 

30 If any thing be revealed to another that sitteth by, let the first hold his peace.

In a mature group, pluralities should form (informally) around spiritual gifts. Teachers and prophets alike should learn to work together rather than against each other (competition). Trying to create this model out of pure human effort will lead to division and control. If everyone seeks the welfare of others and the Holy Spirit is allowed to operate, these things will develop quite [super]naturally.

The important things to remember:

· Unless deliberately structured, no one except the Holy Spirit should have control over the meeting.

· No one’s spiritual gift is more important than another’s.

· Our purpose in the body of Christ is to grow into the image of Christ and mentor others.

· Everyone should participate in the body of Christ according to the gift that is at work in him or her.

· No one has the exclusive ear to what God says to His people. No one.
 

Tuesday 20 October 2015

Cleansing Streams Unscriptural Nonsense


Cleansing Streams
Unscriptural Nonsense

Although some of the authors concepts I do not necessarily wholeheartedly agree with, the majority if this expose is sound doctrinally.
The work of the Father through The Lord Jesus Christ is a FINISHED work in every believer the moment he is accepted in the beloved.
This is and has always been of the undeserved and unconditional love of God and as in Romans 5, it a gift of God minus any works to earn it, or to allow it to continue in our lives.
We through the renewing of our minds, or the finding out about this incredible gift of salvation are then able to enter into our position in the Godhead as one spirit with the living God, totally accepted in the beloved not according to our righteousness but His!
The blood of Jesus has already not only forgiven us of all our sin past present and future, but we have been born again and are new spirits, whose voice, our conscience, is also clean and clear of all unrighteousness, once and for all.
Done done all done.
So who are these that would insert themselves in between our true mediator, between us and God the Father, Jesus Christ and why?
You tell me!
They are either ignorant of the true righteousness of God, or are purposely making merchandise out of the people of God, being taken captive by these at their will.
Paul Otta

Quoted from
letusreason.org

Chapter Nine

Johnny sat alone in his apartment with his thoughts running wild. "Why didn't I manifest a demon? Maybe I need to go through the program again?" Johnny remembered he hadn't checked his answering machine since coming home from the retreat, so he leaped out his favorite chair and went into the bedroom. 

"Hi Johnny, this is Larry. Remember me? I haven't heard from you in a couple of months and I was wondering how you are doing. Why don't you give me call soon? Remember we were going to do lunch? Call me. Thanks." 

Johnny looked for Larry's number and picked up the phone. "Hello Larry? It's Johnny!" 

"Hey Johnny! How are you doing? I've been thinking about you a lot lately. What have you been up to?" 

"Well, I just finished the Cleansing Stream retreat. I just got home about fifteen minutes ago and just listened to my messages." 

"How did the retreat go?" Larry's voice echoed concern. 

"All right I guess. I don't know. I don't think anything happened to me." 

"What do you mean?" 

"I didn't manifest a demon and I'm not sure what my problem might really be. Nothing happened. I just got prayer and nothing happened." Johnny shoulders slumped and his body felt weary from lack of sleep. 

"Johnny, I can hear that you're pretty tired. Why don't you get some sleep and we will talk sometime tomorrow. How about lunch? Are you up for it?" 

"Yeah, let's do it. Where do you want to go?" 

"I know a great place near your house. Do you like Italian food?" 

"Sure, who doesn't!" 

"Great! I will give you directions and meet you there around noon." 

The air was warm and a slight ocean breeze whipped through the city; it was another typical day in Southern California. Johnny felt better after a good night sleep and waited anxiously for Larry at the restaurant. Larry arrived and both were seated outside on the patio. 

Larry jumped right into the conversation. "Johnny, I am concerned about your involvement in the Cleansing Stream." 

"Really? How come?" Johnny was caught off guard by Larry's forthrightness. 

"I don't believe the Scriptures teach that Christian's are demon bound, or that Christians need deliverance." Larry spoke with compassion, but his voice was firm. 

"Larry, aren't you just are being ignorant of Satan's devices? I have seen Christians manifest demons! Besides, how could someone like Jack Hayford be wrong? I don't know much, but I trust Jack!" 

"The issue isn't about trusting Jack Hayford. The issue is biblical truth and this program is not in accordance with what the Bible teaches about sanctification. I know you are young and have not studied that much, but you need to search the Scriptures and test this program. Good men like Jack Hayford and others can be in error." 

The waitress hated to interrupt the conversation, but coughed slightly to make her presence known. "Hi guys. We are having a great lunch special today. It is spaghetti with our special meat sauce, along with a salad, roll, and a drink for $4.95!" 

"Mmm. . . that sounds great!" Larry looked at Johnny with a nod. 

"Yeah, make that two." Johnny quipped. 

The waitress finished taking the order for dressings and drinks, and soon left the two to continue the conversation. 

"You know Johnny, I really care about you. I know that you might not understand my objections, but this is part of growing in Christ. You have to begin to exercise discernment. I wish I could say that everything out there in Christianity was biblically sound, but that is not the case. We have to study and hold fast to truth. There will always be men who pervert truth. You need to watch yourself." 

"I agree Larry, but this program quotes from the Bible. How am I supposed to know better? I can't take you around with me everywhere." 

"I know. This is why you have to learn how to interpret the Bible for yourself. I've been through Bible college and I can give you some materials on how to study the Scriptures. There are principles that we use to arrive at the meaning of the text. You will see that this program does not follow those principles very well at all." 

"All right, so what do you think my problem really is Larry? I struggle with lust and pornography. I do things I hate! I feel like I am bound in my sin, just like Cleansing Stream tells me. If they are wrong, then how am I supposed to get free from this? What is going on with me? Johnny's voice conveyed desperation and deep emotional struggle. 

"Johnny, this is what the Bible says about sanctification . . ." 

The struggle with sin is a real battle for Christians. Some find that they are not often victorious in an area(s) in their life and thus begin to wonder what is wrong with them. It is often in this state of vulnerability that a program like Cleansing Stream can seem like a Coast Guard helicopter arriving to help a stranded boat being tossed on a stormy sea. While the motives for seeking help are plenteous, the sad reality is that Cleansing Stream is the last thing that struggling or strong Christians need. 

The Corinthian church to which Paul wrote was a church plagued with problems. From factions to incest, this church needed strong counsel from the Apostle Paul and they received it. Yet in his counsel, remarkably Paul never tells the Corinthian believers that they need deliverance, or that they are bound with hooks! Instead Paul reminds them, 

Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, not idolaters, not adulterers, not homosexuals, nor sodomites, not thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you. But you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of our God. (Emphasis mine)(76) 

Look at this list of sins! Yet Paul reminds the believers that they have been washed, sanctified, and justified. Clearly the power of the Gospel and the miracle of regeneration has made these believers new creations. A believer in Christ has been set free from the dominion of sin and is no longer called by the sin trait that used to dominate his life. A believer is now called a saint and is told to live like one, not to be delivered from demonic control. 

This truth is proclaimed in Romans 6:1-23, which is the believer's "emancipation proclamation." Paul writes to the Roman Christians, "knowing this, that our old man was crucified with Him, that the body of sin might be done away with, that we should no longer be slaves of sin."(77) For a believer the battle with sin has been won in Christ, as Paul states, "But God be thanked that though you were slaves of sin, yet you obeyed from the heart that form of doctrine to which you were delivered. And having been set free from sin, you became slaves of righteousness."(78) This truth should cause the heart to leap for joy and to praise God for what He has done through Christ. The Christian is free! This truth must not be watered down. The Bible declares the old man dead and the believer free from the dominion and slavery to sin. Paul declares this truth again in Colossians 3:9-10, "Do not lie to one another, since you have put off the old man with his deeds, and have put on the new man who is renewed in knowledge according to the image of Him who created him." The old man is dead and the believer must know this truth. 

It is precisely because the old man is dead that the believer is given explicit instructions on how to live a Christian life. Paul declares in Romans 6:11 "Likewise you also, reckon yourselves to be dead indeed to sin, but alive to God in Christ Jesus our Lord." Here is the key to progressive sanctification. A believer is to know that he is dead to sin, out from its dominion, and now he is to reckon that fact as truth in his life. What does it mean to reckon? To reckon is to account something as true; it is to consider and believe what is said. Commentator Leon Morris states, "Perhaps here 'regard' or 'recognize' would help us understand that Paul is arguing that his readers should come to see the truth of their situation."(79) Paul's use of reckon is a command and the present tense he uses speaks of the action being a daily ongoing process. Every day the believer is to reckon or count himself dead to sin and alive to God. 

Thus Paul enjoins the believer to action based upon the truth of his new situation. Where once the believer was a slave to sin and under the dominion of sin, he is now free from the dominion of sin and is to account that fact as truth and begin to live in the freedom that Christ has won for him. The command is based upon the fact and the order must not be reversed. The believer does not strive to break sin's dominion. The dominion is already broken! The believer is to live every day as the new and free person that he is. It is only because the believer is a new creation and has died to sin that he can be commanded to no longer let sin reign. The slave has been liberated to serve a new master. Therefore, the old way of life (sin) is incompatible with the new.(80) 

The Method of Sanctification 

The believer is to know and to reckon that he is dead to sin and alive to God. This is the fundamental truth of sanctification and this is the ground from which the believer launches his assault against sin. The method of sanctification is the putting to death the deeds of the body as Romans 8:12 says "For if you live according to the flesh you will die; but if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body, you will live." Paul teaches plainly that believers are to put to death the deeds of the body by the Spirit. The deeds of the body are also the deeds of the flesh, these are the sins that characterized the old man. Here is the rub for many, the subject of the verb "put to death" is "you."(81) It is the believer's task to put to death the sins of the body. This might seem like an impossible request and it would be if it were not for the Holy Spirit. Thankfully, a believer has the Spirit and has been freed from the dominion of sin. Therefore the believer has the very power of God on his side to put to death sin! It makes no sense for a believer to say "I can't" when the Scripture declares that he can and is to be doing it daily by the Spirit. 

Paul describes the battle between the flesh and the Spirit in Galatians 5:16-17 saying, "I say then: Walk in the Spirit, and you shall not fulfill the lust of the flesh. For the flesh lusts against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh; and these are contrary to one another, so that you do not do the things you wish." What does it mean to walk in the Spirit? To walk in the Spirit means to walk under the control of the Spirit. It is living every day controlled by the Spirit which results in the fruits of the Spirit. It is to walk in love, joy, peace, longsuffering, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. In Galatians 5:16 Paul made a very emphatic statement, "Walk in the Spirit, and you shall not fulfill the lust of the flesh." The "shall not fulfill" renders an emphatic negative in the Greek language. What that means is that Paul stated as strongly as possible the impossibility of fulfilling the lust of the flesh for the one who walks in the Spirit.(82) Again the believer is confronted with the absolute possibility of putting to death sin by the Spirit. The flesh is no match for the Spirit. 

A believer should feel very comforted and confident that the power of sin has been broken. There is hope in the battle to daily put off the deeds of the body, but this does not minimize a Christian's struggle. The struggle with sin is real and Dr. John MacArthur is very helpful here, "Paul does not promise immediate freedom from sin's harassment . . . on the contrary, he speaks of a continuous struggle with sin, where he is persistently, perpetually 'putting to death the deeds of the body.'"(83) Though a believer struggle with sin, he can and is to be victorious since Christ has freed him from its power. 

The Means of Sanctification 

A Christian is to put to death the sin in his life. The power to fulfill the command is found in the current standing of the Christian. The fact that the believer is free from sin's dominion is the force behind the command to not let sin reign in the body. The believer is empowered by the Holy Spirit and is to put since to death. With the Holy Spirit there are other very helpful and essential means that the believer should be using in his war with sin. 

The first means in the war with sin is the Word of God. The Bible often witnesses to its own adequacy in helping a believer walk in sanctification. Consider the passage in Psalm 119:9-11 "How can a young man cleanse his way? By taking heed according to Your word . . . . Your word have I hidden in my heart that I might not sin against You." Another passage that is helpful is 2 Timothy 3:16-17, "All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work." Finally there are the words of the Savior, "Sanctify them by Your truth. Your word is truth."(84) It is in the Scriptures that the believer learns of the wonders of Christ and the extent of the power of salvation. To neglect the Word is to stunt growth that is in no other way possible. 

The second means in the war with sin is prayer. Jesus taught prayer in Matthew 6:9-13 and specifically mentioned that a believer should pray, "And do not lead us into temptation, but deliver us from the evil one." The believer is to be a man of prayer and needs to heed the command of Christ. An example of the believer's need for prayer is found in the garden of Gethsemane where Jesus went to pray. Jesus was asking his disciples Peter, James and John to watch with Him as He prayed. Instead the disciples slept and Jesus warned, "Watch and pray, lest you enter into temptation. The spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak."(85) Believers need to be people of prayer and need to humbly acknowledge their dependence upon God for protection from temptations in which they might stumble into sin. The prayer Jesus taught his disciples also looks for protection from the evil one Satan. This calls to mind the words of Jesus in Luke 22:31-32, "And the Lord said, 'Simon, Simon! Indeed, Satan has asked for you, that he may sift you as wheat. But I have prayed for you, that your faith should not fail; and when you have returned to Me, strengthen your brethren." There is a demonic element that believers can face and at times do face, yet these trials are not internal demonic hooks that need exorcism. The good news is that believers have a High Priest named Jesus Christ who is in heaven. The call for believers is to pray! They are to be watchful in prayer and to entreat God for protection. 

The third means in the war with sin is to be filled with the Spirit. Ephesians 5:18 declares, "And do not be drunk with wine, in which is dissipation; but be filled with the Spirit." This call to be filled with the Spirit is essential for the believer's walk in Christ. The filling of the Spirit is a continual action that means to live a life controlled by the Spirit. Believers are to yield themselves to the power of the Spirit of God, but this is not passivity. Dr. MacArthur states, 

In other words, it is worth repeated reminders that Christians cannot abandon their own responsibility and passively wait for God to mortify sin on their behalf. The Spirit-filled life is active, vigorous, working endeavor, where they work out their own salvation with fear and trembling (Phil. 2:12). When they obey, they then discover that it is actually God who is at work in them "both to will and to work for His good pleasure" (v. 13).(86) 

Living a life that is Spirit-controlled is where the believer finds the strength to obey the commands of put off what characterized the old man and put on what characterizes the new man. 

To some this might sound like a whole lot of theory and no practice. Often the biblical view of sanctification described here is considered "simplistic" and not practical in the "real world." Biblical sanctification teaching is like "telling a blind man that he can go ahead and see." The difficulty lies not in the Scriptural model of sanctification, but in today's model of pastoring and counseling which often better reflects a psychologist's office or a motivational speaker's litany. Some have never seen solid biblical counseling and thus deduce that there is no such animal and that it doesn't work. Others have languished under poor or nonexistent biblical teaching and thus have never heard or reject biblical sanctification in favor for what is popular today. What is presented here is what Scripture teaches regarding sanctification. Paul never commands believers to minister deliverance to each other when there is sin. Scripture does not know Cleansing Stream's model of demonic sanctification. 

Notes

76. 1 Corinthians 6:9-11. 

77. Romans 6:6. 

78. Romans 6:17-18. 

79. Leon Morris "The Epistle to the Romans," Pillar (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1988), 256. 

80. Some might want to object at this point, "This is way too simplistic!" Some think that the problems faced today are of a different cloth and that this biblical model is not adequate to handle the problems of modern society. This objection is false and only the biblical model will bring true freedom to believers. 

81. The verbal ending is plural (you'all) and refers to the "brothers" addressed in verse 12, but the principle and application for believers can be singular (you). This is not a passive sanctification that waits for God to come and take sin away. There are some who believe that God must deliver them from their sin and anything else is just wasted effort. This means that they indulge in the sin and make no real effort to kill it. An example of this is found in Christians who know that smoking is a sin in their life but are not willing to throw out the cigarettes. How about Christians who are overweight but will not stop eating ice cream? These ones are waiting for a deliverance rather than being obedient to what God would tell them to do. It is easier to have God "take away" the sin than to put it to death. It is easier to "be delivered" of a demon than to obey the command to put sin to death. 

82. Daniel B. Wallace, Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1996), 468. Wallace states that an emphatic negation rules out the idea as being a possibility. 

83. John MacArthur "Mortification of Sin," The Master's Seminary Journal (Spring 1994): 12. 

84. John 17:17. 

85. Matthew 26:41. 

86. MacArthur, op. cit., 18. 

Chapter Ten

Larry finished explaining some of the facets of sanctification. "Your problem Johnny is not demons, but your flesh. You are a new creation and the dominion that sin exercised over you is now finished. The struggle you are engaged in is the war to put to death those things which categorized your old way of life. Sins like lust do not magically disappear! You can't cast out the flesh! I know that you have heard the testimonies of people saying that a spirit of anger or a spirit of adultery were cast out, but that is just flat out wrong." 

"Man, you have really hit home Larry. This is really difficult. I want to get this straight; are you saying that there is no such thing as a bound believer?" 

"Where do you find a "bound" believer in Scripture Johnny?" 

"I don't know, but the Cleansing Stream is really emphasizing that believers are bound. I guess at times I feel bound. How would you explain bound believers?" 

As it was mentioned early in the beginning of this paper, the enigma of "bound" believers is at the core of deliverance ministry. Often Christian ministers with large pastoral hearts want answers to the perplexing problems that plague certain believers. There are believers that appear to always fall into sin, and this has caused some ministers to give deliverance ministry a try. But throughout this examination of Cleansing Stream, the doctrinal foundations for what the program is doing have been precarious and most of the time nonexistent. Still the question is asked, "What about bound believers?" This question demands a biblical response. 

To start it is helpful to define just what Cleansing Stream means when it speaks about "bound" believers. The words of Tim Davis seem to help define this elusive group: 

One day while wrestling with these thoughts the Lord said, 'Tim, the problem is not with you,' and He began to layout the ingredients for preparing people for deliverance. When people walked through these steps, the cleansing began to take place on a more regular basis. Homosexuals have been freed, those bound in witchcraft, alcoholism, adultery, fear, and rejection have been delivered, and the words of Jesus, that He has 'come to set the captives free' have been experienced in many lives. (87) 

It appears that a bound believer is one who is living in some sort of repeated sin. These are ones who don't seem to get free from sin easily or never and thus this program steps in to fill the gap and get the believer free. But Romans 6:1 ff. declares the believer to be free from the dominion of sin from the moment of conversion on. The power of sin has been broken and the believer is commanded to put off the old way and walk in the Spirit. There definitely appears to be a contradiction here. Is a believer free from sin or not? What is going on with these believers? 

The tough question that needs to be asked is whether these "believers" are truly believers. This does not mean that any believer who struggles with sin is not saved, but the question is valid for those who continually live in sin. There is no room in Scripture for the habitual sinner to claim true fellowship with Christ. These are tough words, but Scripture bears them out. Consider the passage in 1 John 2:3-6, 

Now by this we know that we know Him, if we keep His commandments. He who says, "I know Him," and does not keep His commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him. But whoever keeps His word, truly the love of God is perfected in him. By this we know that we are in Him. He who says he abides in Him ought himself also to walk just as He walked. 

This passage aptly demonstrates the fundamental truth that believers do not live in sin. It is not difficult to imagine that what happens often in the Cleansing Stream is the misdiagnosis of a spiritual malady. A person is not a believer because they have raised their hands and bowed their heads at an altar call. To be a true believer is to have had a genuine conversion by God which will produce good works. The imprecise Gospel proclamations that characterize a large segment of the body of Christ have produced a whole generation of "defeated Christians" who are not really Christians.(88) Thus in one aspect what appears to be a "bound" believer is really a pagan with Christian religion. These ones are incapable of ever pleasing God or of being free from sin in their state of unregeneration. The call is to proclaim the Gospel accurately and have these ones look to Christ for their salvation which will produce the ability to put sin to death. 

But what if the person is truly a Christian? Can Christians struggle in a sinful condition? The answer is yes. Do they need deliverance? No! As with the tragedy of the lack of sound Gospel presentations to lost souls, so also is the tragedy of the lack of sound biblical teaching on sanctification in the pulpit. How do programs like Cleansing Stream gain a foothold in a church? The foothold comes when a church abandons solid expositional preaching and teaching of the whole counsel of God. The biblical model of sanctification is to put off sin and to put on righteousness, but these truths are not taught in their power and simplicity. If a believer is sinning then that believer needs to be taken through the Scriptures and to know he is dead to sin. From there he is to reckon himself to be dead to sin, which means he will fully consider what Scripture says to be true regarding himself. The power of sin and its dominion over him have been broken and his old man is dead in Christ. The sin which besets him can and is to be put off since he is a new creation. This believer is to present his members no longer to unrighteousness to sin, but to righteousness to God. This is the model of sanctification found in the Scripture. There is no command or instruction to tell this believer that his sin is from a demon and that he needs to renounce this demon foothold. This does not rule out that a believer cannot at times struggle with sin, but what the struggling brother needs is the love and help of a sound biblical pastor and church.(89) 

Often there are objections at this point because of a stereotypical picture of this type of biblical minister. The common stereotype of the biblical model believes that biblical pastoral counseling is done without love and excels at "throwing the Book" at the struggling Christian. But this is just an excuse made by some to evade the biblical model of sanctification. There might be uncaring pastors who "throw the Book" at others, but that does not invalidate the biblical model of sanctification. The struggling Christian must be loved and prayed with and counseled from Scripture. There might be moments and days when sinful habits seem to overcome a believer, but the believer must stand in his position in Christ believing firmly in his heart, "I am dead to sin and alive to God in Christ Jesus my Lord!" This is not a ritualistic formula but a heartfelt declaration of truth. The believer is free from the dominion of sin and can and must put sin to death by the power of the Holy Spirit. The Cleansing Stream goes beyond Scripture and supplements its own program of demonic sanctification. This program must be rejected and the believer must take responsibility for his life and actions. Ultimately the assigning of sin to demons and the whole deliverance model is destructive. Dr. R. C. Sproul exclaims regarding this type of ministry, 

We have people saying that particular demons cause particular sins. There is, they say, a demon of alcohol, a demon of depression, a demon of tobacco and so on . . . there are demons for every conceivable sin. Not only must these demons be exorcized, but there are necessary procedures to keep them from returning on a daily basis. I know of no polite way to respond to this kind of teaching. It is unmitigated nonsense. Nowhere in sacred Scripture is there to be found the slightest hint of this kind of demonic diagnosis. These teachings cross the line into the sphere of magic and result in serious harm to believers who are duped by them . . . . Therefore, I say that with all urgency that believers must turn from those who teach such things. Indeed run, for your very spiritual lives.(90) 

These are sobering words. Dr. Sproul and others recognize the dangers of this type of error and warn emphatically against participation in it. A believer may sin repeatedly, but he is to be counseled from Scripture and to seek help from competent biblical counselors. 

Notes

87. Davis, 1. 

88. The Gospel in many segments of the Church is not accurately being preached. The message of sin and the call to repentance and faith are often never heard. What is commonly substituted is a weak message on the love of God. The preaching of the law must precede the preaching of grace. Christ is the Savior from sin, and the Gospel is the message of forgiveness of sins. A half-gospel invites stillbirths and produces pagans with Christian religion who wonder why they can't get free from sin. 

89. Yes, a sinning brother needs love. But this is not love by the contemporary definition of the word. Biblical love will rebuke and reprove those in error for their benefit. Biblical love does not allow blame-shifting of sin onto demons or generational curses or society. Biblical love is not psychologizing sin into dysfunction and thus excusing sin as an addiction. The believer must be loved enough to be told the truth and commanded to flee from his sin. 

90. R. C. Sproul, Pleasing God (Wheaton: Tyndale House Publishers, 1988), 90-92

Chapter Eleven

"Will that be all for you guys? I hope you enjoyed your meal." The waitress smiled and waited to drop the bill. 

"Are you done Johnny? Do you want some desert?" 

"Naa, I'm done." 

"Me too. Thanks, but we will take the check please." 

"You got it. Have a good day guys." 

Johnny sat for awhile trying to gather his thoughts. Lunch was only about an hour, but all that Johnny learned from Cleansing Stream was challenged as unbiblical. 

"Larry, I appreciate your taking this time to talk to me. I am not sure what I am going to do. What you have said has really caused me to think. I need to go home and study. If I have some more questions can you help me?" 

"I would be honored Johnny. I can even help you with some information on how to study your Bible." 

"Thanks, I definitely need it." 

"Search all that I have said in Scripture. Make sure you test everything by God's Word. Hey Johnny, give that back!" Larry reached out and tried to grab Johnny's hand. 

"Nope, I've got the bill on this one." 

Though the Cleansing Stream logo depicts a beautiful stream of water flowing by a healthy tree, upon closer examination this stream is found to be filled with toxic waste from a theological Chernobyl. The Cleansing Stream is a theological Marah which needs to have the tree of sound doctrine placed in it to make the bitter water sweet. In Johnny's case, he is blessed to have a friend like Larry. Many today are not so blessed. Often times believers are sheep who fall into the hands of a poor shepherd who leads them to drink from polluted streams. This author knows that the struggle with sin is real. There is no shortcut on the sanctification highway. Sin must be put to death and the mind must be renewed! The Cleansing Stream wants to step in and help believers, but it is actually doing the exact opposite and harming believers. The emphasis on Satan and demons is out of balance with Scripture and the methods of "cleansing" are flat out error. What Christians need is to return to biblical sanctification, not to have demons cast out. The Cleansing Stream should have a warning sign which says "Contaminated Water!" This stream is polluted and will harm any who drink from it. The call is to come out from this program and to hold fast to what God's Word teaches about sanctification. 

- See more at: http://www.inplainsite.org/html/cleansing_stream.html#sthash.oGSUrJAV.dpufo

Friday 16 October 2015

FUNCTIONARY GIFTS NOT OFFICES



Considering all we have examined thus far, it should already be clear that the distinction presented forth by organized religion called clergy and laity is most apparently false and against the teaching of Scripture! Please understand that my point is not to suggest that the many individuals who consider themselves ―pastors‖ and ―teachers‖ in the body of Christ are all evil people. Many of them are sincere and love God deeply and desire to serve the Lord with all their hearts. Truly some abide by these concepts out of ignorance and others keep them because of fear. But let us move now from ignorance to truth! And let us stop fearing men but trusting God at last, for either we trust that He is Lord or we don‘t. Let us center our lives around the strong foundation, which is Christ the Lord!
It is a grievous thing among God‘s people today when we miss the bold admonishment of Scripture, which teaches us to recognize such gifts that God gives us as intended simply for function in the body to help us to grow up together in Him; not to make us lords over one another and not to create offices and religious titles for ourselves to prance around in. A lot of those in ―church leadership‖ love to quote Ephesians 4:11 as their banner verse to justify what they call ―the five fold ministry‖; representative of institutional church government and hierarchy.
Ephesians 4:11 (NIV) - It was He who gave some to be apostles, some to be prophets, some to be evangelists, and some to be pastors and teachers...
So much is implied in this kind of terminology (i.e. ―the five-fold government‖) that is, in all actuality, the imagination of man... far beyond what the Scripture passage itself actually teaches. Paul never says in this passage that these five ministries are offices. Nor does he say they are titles or official positions of ―ministry.‖ What Paul does say, first of all, is that these are GIFTS:
Ephesians 4:8 (NKJV) - Therefore He says: "When He ascended on high, He led captivity captive, And gave gifts to men."
And here is where the real damage has been done; In the actual Greek, these ―ministries‖ are actually descriptions of FUNCTION not office! They are NOT titles!
They are all ACTION words! Paul is not listing hierarchical church offices or titles for men to wear on their shirt; he is making mention of gifts of service to the body of Christ - PERIOD. Unfortunately, you will not likely ever hear this preached from a pulpit any time soon because if the truth were told (or in some cases we might start with ―known‖), this would cause these false kingdoms of men, even the entire clergy system, to begin to crumble.
Let‘s look at these ministries, briefly, one by one and then we will re-examine this passage according to its literal translation...
The first gift he (Paul) mentions is that of apostles. The word in the Greek is ―apostolos‖ – it means ―one that is sent‖ and more specifically, ―one that is sent/commissioned/appointed BY CHRIST with the message of the Gospel.‖ It is exactly
synonymous with the Greek verb (apostello), which means ―to send out (as on a
mission); to go to a place appointed‖. Generally, in the New Testament, it is used in past participle form but, on occasion, it is used in present participle form (e.g. Matthew 10:16 – ―I send you out...‖). It is the same as to say, ―a  ̳sent one‘ is one who is  ̳sent out‘.‖ They are both, essentially, the exact same word in the Greek but only one is the noun form of the word and one is the verb form of that same word (e.g. as ―worker‖ is to ―working‖ or ―worked‖). Look at the following verse to gain a better comprehension of this word‘s use as a verb – Notice how Paul, in this passage, rather than simply saying, ―I am an apostle,‖ he rather describes the function of his calling – ―being sent‖ (apostled, if you will) to spread the Good News.
1 Corinthians 1:17 (GW) - Christ didn't send me (apostello) to baptize. Instead, he sent me to spread the Good News. I didn't use intellectual arguments. That would have made
the cross of Christ lose its meaning.
It is really this simple in the Greek. But religiously-minded men, whose thinking has been corrupted by this world‘s system (and the religious traditions developed over the centuries), imply that it is far more complex and it is they who insert the ―officialdom‖ to these concepts. Scripture simply describes function. Anything else would incite to pride and be opposed to the teaching of Christ concerning service in the body. Gerhardt Kittel‘s Theological Dictionary of the New Testament says the following concerning the Greek word ―apostolos‖ to illustrate how religious tradition throughout history began to reshape how people conceptually viewed the gift of ―apostling‖ and turned it into a title and an office:
"Originally it was an adjective as shown by Plat. Ep. VII, 346a...The most that can be said is that the word denotes the quality of being sent, unless we are to regard it as no more than a stereotyped term...Thus its later Christian usage [as a title] was an innovation to Greek ears or those familiar with Greek. This is shown by the fact that the Latin did not translate it, but took it over as a lone word into ecclesiastical Latin (apostolus)".
Unfortunately, the concept of ―apostle‖ as a hierarchical term of official, even professional, leadership – as biblically false as that concept is – has remained, due to the so-called ―wisdom‖ of the clergy and their made up traditions which have influenced so many. It really is like the blind leading the blind. Both are headed for a ditch. God- willing, it is my prayer that many will awake and come to a knowledge of the truth.
NOTE: Also notice in the previous passage (1 Corinthians 1:17) how Paul states that he didn‘t use intellectual arguments to persuade people because that would have made the cross of Christ lose its meaning. Isn‘t it interesting that one of the principle purposes of homiletic preaching, as taught in seminaries, is to learn to orate skillfully and with intellectual reason in order that you may effectively persuade your hearers? This is man‘s strength, not the strength of the Holy Spirit. The Gospel itself is the power of God unto salvation (Romans 1:16), not how cleverly we can manipulate people to respond to alter calls or subjugate themselves to the traditions of men that sound godly but are utterly godless in origin.
1 Corinthians 2:2-5 (NASB) - For I determined to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ, and Him crucified. I was with you in weakness and in fear and in much trembling, and my message and my preaching were not in persuasive words of wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power, so that your faith would not rest on the wisdom of men, but on the power of God.
Some may say, ―but you did not continue with the rest of the passage Dave... Paul continued to say there was a time to preach with wisdom.‖ Yes, with wisdom, but not wisdom as man regards. Observe:
1 Corinthians 2:6-7 (MSG) - We, of course, have plenty of wisdom to pass on to you once you get your feet on firm spiritual ground, but it's not popular wisdom, the fashionable wisdom of high-priced experts that will be out-of-date in a year or so. God's wisdom is something mysterious that goes deep into the interior of his purposes. You don't find it lying around on the surface. It's not the latest message, but more like the oldest--what God determined as the way to bring out his best in us, long before we ever arrived on the scene.
So, getting back to our subject, we can see, according to the actual language of Scripture, that this is not a reference to someone who has been through 8 years of Bible College and earned some theological degree. This is not a reference to someone who has been formally ordained to a religious office by some denomination or organization of men. Neither is it some officially weighted title conferred on an individual by another title bearer (i.e. one ―apostle‖ to another). In fact, Paul himself was a ―sent one‖ and he made it very clear that his calling to go and preach the Gospel had NOTHING to do with being appointed or approved by men, let alone some official religious group. He made it a point to say that no other apostle gave him this commission and he did not receive his commission in the most likely place one would expect there to be a religious commission to transpire (Jerusalem – the hub of the religious world). Listen as Paul describes his functionary ministry as a sent one (notice how he describes his calling as being ―to preach‖ – ACTION – notice that he does not claim some title or office or religious profession but simply the fact that God called him to service – a service that he regarded wholly as God‘s rich grace):
Galatians 1:15-19 (NASB) - But when God, who had set me apart even from my mother's womb and called me through His grace, was pleased to reveal His Son in me so that I might preach Him among the Gentiles, I did not immediately consult with flesh and blood, nor did I go up to Jerusalem to those who were apostles before me; but I went away to Arabia, and returned once more to Damascus. Then three years later I went up to Jerusalem to become acquainted with Cephas, and stayed with him fifteen days. But I did not see any other of the apostles except James, the Lord's brother.
Take some time and examine every reference to Paul or any one of the apostles in the New Testament. It may impress you to find that there is not one place where a servant of God is referenced by a title preceding their name. Paul, for example, NEVER identified himself as ―the Apostle Paul.‖ Peter was never called ―Pastor Peter.‖ And no man, in all of Scripture, is ever called ―Reverend‖ (only God alone bears this title – Psalm 111:9)! In every case, if there is any direct mention made of their gift at all, it is ALWAYS descriptive of function – NOT OFFICE. Isn‘t this curious? You would think the example of titles of ministry were plastered all over the pages of the New Testament when you consider how the modern day church system thrives on them. But Jesus never told Peter, ―If you love Me, be ordained as a pastor.‖ No, rather He said, ―if you love Me, feed (pastor) My sheep.‖ You see? Function. Service. Love. Paul, as I mentioned earlier never called himself ―The Apostle Paul‖ but he sometimes referred to himself as simply ―Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ‖ (in other words ―a commissioned messenger of the Lord‖) – 2 Corinthians 1:1 for example. Again – ALWAYS FUNCTIONAL SERVING THROUGH LOVE AND OBEDIENCE TO CHRIST. Another example is the opening statement in his letter to the Romans:
Romans 1:1 (GW) - From Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle and appointed to spread the Good News of God.
Furthermore, we might also want to consider the fact that Paul‘s commission was rejected by the religious leaders of his day. They did not recognize him as being sufficiently ―authorized‖ to declare the message of God and they were so infuriated that he dared to preach and claim he was called by God to share God‘s message that they actually plotted to kill him (Acts 9:23)!
The whole notion of “special ordination” by some church or denomination or whatever, is simply COMPLETELY foreign to God‟s Word!
Continuing on, let‘s look at some of the other ―gifts‖ mentioned in the Ephesians 4 passage...
Vs. 11 – ―...some as prophets...‖
The Greek word is prophetes and is also an action word. Again it is NOT a title or office
– and it‘s certainly not a religious profession. This word simply identifies one who speaks by divine inspiration and ―declares to men what he has received by inspiration, especially concerning future events, and in particular such as relate to the cause and kingdom of God and to human salvation‖ (Thayer‘s Greek Lexicon). Its verb form is
―propheteuo‖, which means to speak by divine inspiration.
Again, this is not a word describing ―office‖ and there is NO MENTION of any ordination requirement for such who operate this gift of God. BECAUSE IT IS A GIFT OF GOD! Furthermore, it is not a gift excluded to an elite few, but given to each one according to God‘s choosing.
1 Corinthians 12:7 (MSG) - Each person is given something to do that shows who God is: Everyone gets in on it, everyone benefits. All kinds of things are handed out by the Spirit, and to all kinds of people!
1 Corinthians 12:11 (MSG) - All these gifts have a common origin, but are handed out one by one by the one Spirit of God. He decides who gets what, and when.
According to 1 Corinthians 14, a prophet is simply anyone who prophesies! Read the chapter. Examine the context. See if this is not absolutely true.
1 Corinthians 14:31 - For you can all prophesy in turn so that everyone may be instructed and encouraged.
Next, Ephesians 4, Vs. 11 – ―...some as evangelists...‖
This Greek term, euaggelistes, simply refers to ―one who brings good tidings‖. In other
words it is one that God has called to declare (or ―preach‖) the joyful news of the Gospel to others. Not the ―Word of Faith‖ teaching, not the ―doctrine of tithing‖, not ―how to be a good person and get blessings from God‖, not ―how to grow your church in 15 easy steps‖, BUT THE GOSPEL OF JESUS CHRIST! Again, it is a term that represents function and action. It is not an exclusive ministry occupied by only an elite few who have been formally ordained by special, ―qualified‖ religious leaders. Just like the others, this is a GIFT OF GOD, that GOD HIMSELF places in the heart of WHOEVER HE WILLS! It does not require the commissioning or approval of men to actuate.
Paul, as a matter of fact, was also an ―evangelist‖ as much as he was an ―apostle‖ (or put more correctly – Paul ―evangelized‖ just as sure as he was ―sent by Christ‖ to bring God‘s glad tidings to the Gentiles). Observe the following verse:
Galatians 1:16a (NLT) - Then he revealed his Son to me so that I could proclaim the Good News about Jesus to the Gentiles...
The word ―proclaim‖ (euaggelizo - ―to bring good tidings‖) is EXACTLY synonymous in the Greek with the word for ―evangelist‖ (euaggelistes – ―one who brings good tidings‖).
Finally, still verse 11, we have ―...some as pastors and teachers...‖
These two (in my studied opinion) should actually be recognized as one connected ministry gift. The word ―and‖ is not an adequate translation of the Greek term in use here. At best, these two words ought to be hyphenated as ―pastor-teachers‖.
The word pastor, ―poimen‖, describes ―one who tenderly, though diligently, watches out for the others‖. The Greek concept of a shepherd is one who ―guides‖ sheep, not who drives them. He leads not merely by speech but with the example of a life submitted to Christ and which models the character of Christ. He may watch over, but he doesn‘t rule over. His service is under the Great Shepherd and he does not call the sheep his own.
The word teacher, ―didaskalos‖, describes the gifting to ―teach others in the way of the truth‖ The teacher is one whose teaching is coupled by a life that models what he guides others in. The Pharisees loved to be called ―Rabbi‖ (which means ―my honored Teacher‖) by their followers, but Jesus did not tell others to follow everything they do just because they regarded themselves as authorities and ones who loved to be praised by men and to be called Teachers. Rather Jesus said to the Jewish crowds and to His disciples (my paraphrase of Matthew 23:2-4), ―these men like to think they are qualified teachers concerning Moses‘ Law... so, do what they teach as it remains in accord with the truth, but don‘t do as they do because they don‘t put into practice what they teach. Instead, they re-package God‘s Word in a bundle of laws and legalisms to place on you as a heavy burden... a burden that they exempt themselves from.‖
What might Ephesians 4:10-13 look like, in a modern paraphrase, if we honestly translated it according to the proper context of Scripture and put it into terms conveying the actual thought of things?
Ephesians 4:10-13 (paraphrase) – The same Lord, Jesus Christ, who came down from heaven to this earth, is the same One who ascended higher than all the heavens, so that He might fulfill all things and, being Lord of all, fill both heaven and earth with His gifts. It is He who gave some in the body to go as His ambassadors and envoys; to serve Him as ones who are called by Him, commissioned and sent with the message of the Gospel. He gave some to speak forth by the inspiration of His Spirit to declare such things as relate to the cause and kingdom of God and concerning human salvation. He gave others to joyfully declare the good tidings of the Gospel to the lost. And He gave some to lovingly care for His sheep, teaching them about the Lord, their Shepherd, and watching out for wolves that may try to distract them from their Lord, enticing them away from Him, only to devour them. These gifts of functional service, the Lord gave freely (distributing them among all of His people) so that His body – together – would be built up, strong, wholly nourished in the Way, and become more effective in their service to others because they‘re being pulled closer together, everyone moving rhythmically and easily with each other, efficient and graceful in response to God's Son (their Lord and Head), fully mature adults, fully developed within and without, fully alive like Christ.
This is my paraphrase (intending to convey the thought which describes each function)... I trust you get the general idea. Paul means to convey the rich gift of Christ to see His body built up together in HIM. Jesus did not come so that men could set up their own kingdoms and make themselves to be heads over His people. Only Christ is the Head of His Church and only He holds the place of preeminence over His people! (or at least – only He should)
Colossians 1:18 (GNB) - He is the Head of His body, the Church; He is the source of the body's life. He is the first-born Son, who was raised from death, in order that He alone might have the first place in all things.
It would likely take another lengthy article or book to thoroughly examine the full range of the subject concerning ―financing the ministry‖. While I considered delving deeper into the subject here (for there is much I could share), I felt the Lord prompting me to share only what I have. I realize that some may have a lot of questions concerning this issue that are only briefly covered in this writing. I will say that there are a number of excellent resources that have already been written on this topic by others. Rather than attempt to duplicate what many of them have already so eloquently presented, I will instead recommend their work and encourage the reader to examine this topic fully for themselves. One of the best is a book by a good friend of mine, Russell Earl Kelly, called ―Should The Church Teach Tithing.‖ It examines, not only tithing, but the vast subject of giving as taught in the Scriptures. This is a theologian‘s textbook! Highly recommended reading. It is available through my website:
www.truthforfree.com
CONCLUDING THOUGHTS
We need to recognize that when Paul talked about ministry giftings (EVERY TIME), he was describing all of them in the context of family function. NEVER at any time did Paul, or for that matter Christ or the other apostles, teach some formula of hierarchically-led organized religion. The word ―office‖ does not even appear ANYWHERE in the New Testament with respect to serving God or His people (and to show how far we have fallen today, consider how even the Old Testament Prophets did not identify themselves with titles – rather they were humble servants of God, utterly despised by the world and sometimes even by those claiming to be God‘s people because they did not love the truth but had itching ears; desiring to hear what they wanted to hear).
In the New Testament there is no mention of titles, offices, or professional ministry paradigms. There is to be no such division in the body of Christ represented in some false system of a clergy caste who presides over laity. Jesus said, ―among you is must NOT be so!‖ (Matthew 20:26) Jesus said, ―you are all on the same level as brothers and sisters!‖ (Matthew 23:8) All of these fallacies, these concepts of religious hierarchy, entered into Christian practice literally hundreds of years after Calvary. It was the device of the pagan world and misled believers were influenced by these things, so they gradually moved in among Christians in their gatherings. Satan used these heathen concepts to wreak havoc on the Church; to place God‘s people in bondage, to blind their eyes from the truth, and rob them of their freedom, their zeal, their peace and their joy in serving Christ and one another.
The confrontation of this bold conclusion will, no doubt, cause some to say, ―this cannot be a good thing, for if there is not leadership in the body of Christ, then there will be disorder and chaos and heresy!‖ While I, myself, have identified with this concern in the past (because it was the same concern I first voiced when the Lord began to open up my understanding and exposure to these things), I remind such people who are concerned about this; don‘t let the enemy and tradition distract you from what God‘s Word compels us to embrace... Remember that I have not once, NOT EVER, said that there is no leadership in Christ‘s body. Neither would I dare say that the Word of God presents a leaderless Church. Please hear this and please listen to these words carefully. I believe God desires that there be no confusion concerning this matter in our hearts, but there is a core motive that needs to be exposed and that many of us need to repent of and come to a full realization of the truth. I do not exempt myself from the need to repent of motives that have, at times, steered me away from total submission to the truth God has revealed. That is to say that when God opens our understanding to things it can be wonderful, but it can also be very uncomfortable and even painful because it means we must then lay the axe to our preconceived religious misperceptions. Many of the concepts that we have learned over the years (through some of our religious traditions), thrive on our deep insecurities, the evil desires of our flesh, the wisdom of the world that has influenced us and which appeals to our old nature, and the enemy as well that has lied to us and captivated our attentions away from the truth. Some of these things are hard to confront. Mostly because they remove us from the ability to control one another and to put God into a religious box. But if we don‘t yield to His truth we will be devastated in our error and miss the intimacy and strength that comes from truly knowing Jesus as Lord.
I will continue to reiterate that Christ is the ONLY Head of His Church (1 Corinthians 11:3; Ephesians 1:10, 22; Ephesians 4:15; Ephesians 5:23; Colossians 1:18; Colossians 2:10, 19; etc.), the very core and center (1 Corinthians 3:7; 2 Corinthians 1:12; Colossians 2:2; Revelation 1:13; Revelation 5:6; Revelation 7:17; etc.), the Lord (John 13:13; Acts 10:36; Acts 17:24; Romans 14:9; Philippians 2:11; etc.), the Great Shepherd (Hebrews 13:20) of His flock (the Senior Pastor if you will). What ―leadership‖ is failing here?
Christ promised that His Spirit would lead His followers into ALL truth (John 16:13-15). And He vowed that no one would be able to snatch them from His hand (John 10:27-30). To insure that Christ‘s Lordship would not be usurped by false leaders, He gave gifts to build up His body, to keep her growing and strong, to keep her safe from wolves and religious vipers that would try to get in the middle of their relationship with Christ and manipulate them and draw them after themselves (Acts 20:30).
Yes, absolutely, there is leadership in the Lord‘s Church, His body, but it looks absolutely NOTHING like what wholesale religion has sold most people today! Scripture confirms this so boldly! Those who are afraid of potential chaos and heresy among God‘s people (if they are not ―submitted‖ under the ―covering‖ of some denomination) are more than likely operating in fear and lack of faith in God‘s promise and ability to protect, lead and nourish His people!
I have often wondered (aside from the obvious Scriptural ignorance that exists) how it is so many Christians today speak of ―the five fold ministry‖ when no such phrase is ever used at any time in Scripture. Not only that, but it is not a consistent picture of Paul‘s instruction concerning gifts of service (or ―ministry‖). There is nothing to indicate that the five (or ―four‖ depending on how you read the original Greek) ministry gifts mentioned in Ephesians 4 are exclusive. For example, there is another passage in 1Corinthians 12:28, which mentions, not five... not four... but EIGHT!!!
1 Corinthians 12:28 (MSG) - You're familiar with some of the parts that God has formed in his church, which is his "body": apostles prophets teachers miracle workers healers helpers organizers those who pray in tongues.
It seems rather obvious that Paul is not saying in either passage that ―there are only five important ministries‖ or that ―there are eight‖. It seems clear he‘s not describing titles or offices or religious leadership pyramids. He is describing that there are gifts of functional ministry in God‘s family. But men take the function and the family out of things and replace it with their worldly concepts of hierarchy and business organization and they end up programming the life right out of the gathering of the saints. The kill the body for the sake of building a machine... an idol that reflects their image. A brother I correspond with by the name of Andy shared an article he wrote on the ―five fold‖ gifts and the following are some excerpts from that writing:
―Paul begins by stating that each one of us is given grace. Note that he includes himself in this, ―us‖ referring to the measure (metron) Christ had given him. It is an interesting study to search out in Paul's epistles how many times he referrers to the grace given to him as it related to what he said and did, "according to the grace given unto me" (see Romans 12:3, 12:6, 1 Corinthians 3:10, Ephesians 3:7, 4:7, etc.). However outstanding as Paul's service may have been, he made no distinction between the grace given to him and the grace given to the rest of the believers. This verse alone refutes the idea that a few are exceptional. He goes on to tell how these cooperate—on what basis these graces are given and on what basis they are received. One Bible teacher (Derek Prince) used to say, "When you see the word  ̳therefore‘ in the Bible you need to look and see what it's there for." Here the word ―therefore‖ implies that the following words are an extension and development of the previous thought. In this case it attaches the statement to the explanation of how every one of us is given grace, "he ascended up on high . . . and gave gifts unto men." We see then that the gifts given by the ascended Christ are not given to a special few but are distributed among all.‖
―Simply put, ―all‖ means every one of us! The God and Father of every one of us, is above and upon every one of us, working through every one of us and in every one of us. Nothing could be clearer. Not all are apostles or sent-ones, but all are given grace. These graces or divine empowerments are distributed among all believers to accomplish specific tasks. They are not given to exalt anyone person above the rest. Jesus did not ascend on high and bestow entitlements to rule. He bestowed power to serve.‖
―We have a choice to make. Will we continue on in our comfortable padded pews Sunday after Sunday and abdicate our high callings in Christ's body to the few, or will we move on into the glory of God? We have all been given our measure of Christ that enables us all to do the work of the ministry and equip each other to do the same in the fullest way possible.‖
But some will still grab their tried and true King James Bible and say, ―no Dave, Paul clearly is describing order and position, because he says that apostles are first, etc.‖
Well, in 1 Corinthians 4:9 he (Paul) says they (those who function as apostles) are last, not first. What about that? Obviously, people who fail to see the humility of Paul‘s intent and his description of simple functional service among ALL the brothers and sisters in Christ, are reading their religious bias into the text and not comprehending anything God intended. In case some are still not convinced, let‘s continue to examine the broader context of Scripture, for Paul spoke again about functional ministry in his letter to the Romans. How many clergy men are counting the ministries listed in this passage?
Listen what Paul said to the Romans.
Romans 12:6-13 (NLT) - God has given each of us the ability to do certain things well. So if God has given you the ability to prophesy, speak out when you have faith that God is speaking through you. If your gift is that of serving others, serve them well. If you are a teacher, do a good job of teaching. If your gift is to encourage others, do it! If you have money, share it generously. If God has given you leadership ability, take the responsibility seriously. And if you have a gift for showing kindness to others, do it gladly. Don't just pretend that you love others. Really love them. Hate what is wrong. Stand on the side of the good. Love each other with genuine affection, and take delight in honoring each other. Never be lazy in your work, but serve the Lord enthusiastically. Be glad for all God is planning for you. Be patient in trouble, and always be prayerful. When God's children are in need, be the one to help them out. And get into the habit of inviting guests home for dinner or, if they need lodging, for the night.
Isn‘t it interesting that Paul never says, ―if your ability is to teach, then make sure you get formally ordained as a Teacher by an official appointing of a church organization and expect others to honor you by this title and make sure it is etched on the door of your church office and on your ministry resume.‖ No! A thousand times no! Paul simply says, ―if you‘ve got the gift, then give it!‖ (We might also note, in comparison with the other passages speaking about ministry gifts, again, Paul is does not limit his mention to a mere ―five-fold‖ – or ―eight‖ as we examined in 1 Corinthians 12:28 – but here he mentions ―seven‖... So, which is it all you ―five-folders‖ out there?) I hope it is becoming clearer to us all what these passages mean to represent to us as members of one body.
The ministry of the Church, is just that – The loving service of the family of God. The Lord‘s Church is not represented by a building or a program (not any place in the New Testament)! Just as ―ministry‖ in the Scripture is not a profession. It is functional service in the family of Christ.
I hope that I have helped to clearly illustrate why the concept of a modern day clergy system is problematic at best in light of God‘s Word? I hope the contradiction has become more evident? The priesthood of the New Covenant is intimately and completely tied to the Gospel of Jesus Christ. If there can be another order of priests (i.e. the modern clergy system) who exist beyond what we have been plainly taught in Scripture, then we are left with a most difficult choice to consider; Either God has not told us what is true in His Word (that there is only One Mediator between God and Man, One High Priest, and one single priesthood which includes every believer in Christ before God), or else one must believe that sometime (hundreds of years after the apostles had all died) God changed His mind and introduced ―new revelation‖ that actually was so powerful it had the authority to cancel out the former written word of God. In fact, not only would it have to make the writings of the New Testament inferior, but it would mean that there is another ―new covenant‖ and the New Covenant of Scripture is now obsolete. Either way, it would mean that Scripture no longer holds any application for the believer in Christ – for it stands in total opposition to the entire foundation which holds up the modern clergy system. The New Testament teaches a priesthood that is only mediated by Christ, who dwells in the hearts of His people. They (not a building) are His Temple and they (all of them) are His priests. No other intermediary clergy is mentioned and we must therefore conclude that such is entirely false.
This leaves us with a most sobering discernment we must engage: Any time, I repeat – ANYTIME, a man steps in-between this holy, divine order (where Christ presides over His priesthood – a priesthood he purchased and ―covered‖ with His precious blood), and this man enacts some intermediary function between Christ and the believer – dare I say even positioning himself ―over‖ that believer as an authority, who claims to speak for God and order their obedience (as the modern clergy system essentially does), he is in gross error and proves by his visible position, his title, his words and his actions that he, apparently, does not know or practice the truth in these things.
This is not to say that he necessarily has evil intent or even that he does not have some desire to serve God. It simply says (one of three possibilities) that he is either ignorant himself, deceived, or deliberately deceiving others. Either way, no matter how much good he intends, his position stands in opposition to the Gospel of Jesus Christ and distorts the truth for those following, causing them to stumble and fall into a ditch; widening the wedge of separation between the believer‘s relationship with His Lord, and causing them to place their dependence more upon man than God.
The end result is a mass of believers who lack for knowing who they fully are in Christ and how they are intended to function in the body with one another. They grow weaker and weaker the longer their priesthood is denied and ignored and the voice of the Holy Spirit becomes harder and harder to hear. Haven‘t you ever wondered why it is that so many church folks run to their pastors, apostles and prophets to inquire what God wants them to do? It is for the very same reason that many precious brothers (and sisters) in Christ who have taken on themselves the title of a clergyman (or clergywoman) have become weary and burned out in their profession. Because of the error that both have embraced, both are being spiritually shortchanged and the enemy laughs as they stumble around as if in the dark. They have traded their priesthood and replaced it with a counterfeit! O, dear Christian reading this (whether ―clergyman‖ or ―layperson‖), I pray that God by His wonderful Spirit would set you free in this revelation; that you would no longer be deprived of knowing Christ in the fullness of who He is – Lord, Head, Master Teacher, and Great High Priest. I pray that you would know with such bold confidence, the truth that there is ONE MEDIATOR between you and the Father and it is not any man whatsoever. It is essential that you know Him as He is.
Concepts like those prevalent in the clergy-laity distinction present a severe problem of division in the body of Christ. Many sincere men and women of God throughout the centuries (yes even among the clergy profession) encountered this revelation through God‘s Word and were moved by it. Some literally gave their lives, shedding their own blood, for the liberty of the Gospel – because their message was not often well received. It bucked hard against the established system. They were branded as heretics, rebels and fools. Many were burned alive, tortured, imprisoned and killed for their refusal to bow to a system that robbed them of their priesthood in Christ. Sadly, however, many others thought they could simply repair the problem and reform the system rather than eliminate it altogether in favor of fully embracing Scripture. Oddly enough, these men are often considered heroes in the Christian Faith and we even title them ―The Reformers‖ because they sought to ―re-form‖ the system itself.
But even the reformer, Martin Luther, towards the end of his life, recognized that his ―reformation‖ of organized religion did not (and could not) eliminate all the evils of Rome‘s influence. In truth, as much as he is to be credited for the good things he accomplished (in his sincere attempts to follow Christ within the system), he is also responsible for many of the negative marks that remain. Though most of Luther‘s intentions were good, he is a very large part of the reason most Christians live under Protestant substitutes for Roman Catholicism rather than purely biblical influence. Because of Luther we have professional pastor/priests. Because of Luther we partake of Communion as a solemn funeral-like ceremony (instead of in the context of a full meal in the home as did the early saints). Because of Luther we sit passively in pews and listen to long sermons instead of interacting spontaneously in fellowship with one another whenever and wherever the opportunity may present itself. Because of Luther we have all sorts of churchy, religious traditions that have no foundation in Scripture but are simply carry-overs from Roman Catholic traditions – and we are often led to believe that such are essential to the Christian‘s walk with God and so we start to consider rules made by men as though they were commandments of God, thus fulfilling Jesus‘ comments in Matthew 15:3, 6, & 9.
Please understand, this article is not intended to question the sincerity of those people who are currently part of the clergy system. But it is to question the validity of the clergy system itself. Some of my own heroes of the Faith include men and women of God that were identified with the clergy system. What makes their story exciting to me is that their eyes began to open to the Gospel and it radically transformed so much of their thinking. Many of these endured great personal risk to step out of the known territory they walked blindly in for so many years. I love reading about the Martin Luthers, the William Tyndales, and the John Wycliffes. I sincerely thank God for the many sincere soldiers of truth that have responded to the promptings of the Holy Spirit and the revelation of Scripture and sought to obey the Lord and see God‘s people delivered from bondage (this was Luther‘s heart and passion, despite his failures); however, I have begun to realize myself that one of the principle problems in most moves of God has been that men have sought to ―reform‖ a system of religion that did not purely originate with God to begin with. Rather than understanding fully that Christ is the One who builds His Church and who has declared that the forces of hell even will not prevail against it, they busy themselves with this other thing, which they also wrongly call ―the Church‖, but that is a system whose every root can be traced back to the organizations of men.
History seems to continue to repeat itself time and time again. You would think by now we would recognize the patterns. Man so often tries to box up the moving of the Spirit into a program (turning revival into religion). But God cannot be held inside a box just like the wind cannot blow in a sealed chamber. The organization of religion may accomplish some apparent good in the world in terms of the control it exerts over the external actions of men, but it is powerless to effect real change in the heart and it will always kill the life of the Spirit by inadvertently replacing the voice of God with religious rules and regulations. It‘s really not that different from what the apostles confronted in their day. We can see the same bold proclamation by Paul in the following passage:
Colossians 2:16-23 (MSG) - So don't put up with anyone pressuring you in details of diet, worship services, or holy days. All those things are mere shadows cast before what was to come; the substance is Christ. Don't tolerate people who try to run your life, ordering you to bow and scrape, insisting that you join their obsession with angels and that you seek out visions. They're a lot of hot air, that's all they are. They're completely out of touch with the source of life, Christ, who puts us together in one piece, whose very breath and blood flow through us. He is the Head and we are the body. We can grow up healthy in God only as he nourishes us. So, then, if with Christ you've put all that pretentious and infantile religion behind you, why do you let yourselves be bullied by it? "Don't touch this! Don't taste that! Don't go near this!" Do you think things that are here today and gone tomorrow are worth that kind of attention? Such things sound impressive if said in a deep enough voice. They even give the illusion of being pious and humble and ascetic. But they're just another way of showing off, making yourselves look important.
It really is time we faced facts; that the clergy system produces division and declines spiritual growth among believers in Jesus. It distorts our clear view of the Gospel. It misrepresents the body of Christ. It entangles believers in the law; robbing them of their liberty. It blinds them from the revelation of fully knowing who they are in Christ and short changes them of their role as priests before God. It diminishes their joy and destroys their confidence. It frustrates the grace of God. It denies the truth. It numbs the conscience and the ability to discern truth from error. It is a counterfeit that all true believers must expel if they sincerely desire to live without compromise before the Father.
These titles, terminologies and concepts the world gave us will simply not do. We are family – the very family of God – and we are all brothers and sisters who sit at the feet of one Lord.
As John Wesley said so well:
‖Would to God that all party names and unscriptural phrases and forms which have divided the Christian world were forgot; that we might all agree to sit down together as humble, loving disciples at the feet of a common Master, to hear his word, to imbibe his Spirit, and to transcribe his life into our own.‖
And the great reformer, Martin Luther:
―St. Paul would not permit that any should call themselves of Paul, nor of Peter but of Christ... Cease, my dear friends, to cling to these party names and distinctions; away with them all; let us call ourselves only 'Christians' after him from whom our doctrine comes.‖
And finally, as it was stated in a fantastic article I read once on servantsnews.com:
―Let‘s expose "rank" for what it is: rank! And realize from where the "clergy versus laity" mentality comes: The Adversary.”

WHO ARE THE CLERGY?
By David Yeubanks April 2005